Skip to main content
Axiotech Automation Ltd
+44 (0)7415 112 892
sales@axiotech.co.uk

Records, identity, time, access and recovery

Design trustworthy automation records as an end-to-end system—not as isolated audit-trail checkboxes.

Axiotech assesses and engineers the technical chain through users, PLC/HMI applications, interfaces, time, records, audit-relevant events, storage, review, backup and recovery within a declared intended use.

Scope this requirement See all validation & compliance

Good fit

Use this service when

  • Regulated or quality-managed automation with scoped electronic data and named record consumers.
  • New design, gap assessment, remediation or migration requiring technical data-flow evidence.

Scope boundary

Not assumed or silently included

  • Declaring overall data integrity from a feature checklist without reviewing process and procedural controls.
  • Providing legal, quality or regulatory approval outside the agreed engineering responsibility.

Why act

The operational risk behind the technical symptom

The first work package is shaped around reducing an explicit risk or enabling a named decision.

01

A record cannot be attributed to the person, machine state or approved context that created it.

02

Clock, buffering or interface failures silently reorder or discard events.

03

Backup success is reported while restore, readability and operational recovery remain untested.

Purchasable entry points

Choose a bounded engagement before expanding scope

Final inclusions, dependencies, location, schedule and commercial terms are confirmed in a formal quotation.

Package 1

Data-integrity technical assessment

Decision enabled: A scoped data-flow, control-gap and remediation record.

Typical scope: Intended records, users, flows, time, access, audit, storage, review, backup and recovery assessment.

Package 2

Technical remediation work package

Decision enabled: Specified and verified control improvements for agreed gaps.

Typical scope: Design, PLC/HMI/interface configuration, access/time/event handling, tests and handover.

Package 3

Backup & recovery evidence

Decision enabled: A proven technical restore route with limitations and ownership known.

Typical scope: Asset/baseline inventory, backup design, controlled restore, reconciliation, timing and procedure inputs.

Artefact manifest

What remains after the engineering work

The exact document set scales with risk and the approved work package.

  • Record inventory, intended use and data-flow diagram
  • Identity, access, privilege and audit-event specification
  • Time, interface, buffering and exception design
  • Backup, restore, retention and recovery evidence
  • Gap, risk, test, deviation and procedural-dependency register

Technical and responsibility boundaries

Make ownership reviewable

  • Technical controls are assessed with the processes and procedures that make them effective.
  • Record owner, reviewer, retention authority and exception process remain customer responsibilities unless scoped.
  • Infrastructure, directory, database and backup-platform controls require named IT/OT owners.

Review and acceptance

Six gates from authority to handover

Gate depth changes with the work; named decisions and evidence remain.

  1. G0
    Scope authorityOutcome, boundaries, roles, assumptions and commercial basis agreed.
  2. G1
    Baseline acceptedKnown installed/source state, dependencies, constraints and unknowns recorded.
  3. G2
    Design approvedRequirements, interfaces, risks and acceptance evidence ready for implementation.
  4. G3
    Release candidateBuild reviewed, verified, versioned and accompanied by defect disposition.
  5. G4
    Site acceptanceCommissioning evidence, deviations and release decision recorded.
  6. G5
    Handover acceptedSource, configuration, records, recovery and residual risks transferred.

Read the complete delivery method

Assurance option

Compliance is a declared scope—not a badge

Data integrity depends on complete arrangements across people, process and technology. Axiotech can provide scoped technical assessment and evidence; the regulated organisation determines applicable requirements, procedural controls and fitness for intended use.

Review validation services

Relevant engineering evidence

Automation record and audit-evidence chain

A reference model mapping user action and machine state through time, interface, retained record, review, backup and recovery controls.

Review this evidence

Procurement FAQ

Questions to resolve before quotation

Does an audit trail make the system compliant?

No. Event coverage, identity, meaning, protection, review, retention, time and procedural use all matter within the intended system.

Can a PLC be part of an electronic record?

Yes, depending on intended use and architecture. Its values, context, time, transfer, retention and review controls must be understood end to end.

Is a successful backup enough?

No. Restore integrity, dependencies, readability, reconciliation, recovery time and the approved operational procedure need evidence appropriate to risk.

Next decision

Describe the outcome, installed baseline and constraints you already know.

Use “Not known” where evidence is missing. The first review will separate facts, assumptions and discovery work.

Scope Automation data-integrity engineering